Conflicts often seem intractable because many think a conflict ends when the yelling stops or parties come to a settlement. And then it starts up again, or the same parties begin fighting over a new issue when the most immediate one is settled. Stopping and settling arguments are the two lowest levels of resolution. Both often fail to address emotional issues, and issues that affect an individual’s sense of identity or place in the world. In fact, if you “stop” a dispute by declaring a winner and a loser, or “settle” the dispute by apportioning interests, these deeper roots of that dispute can spread like crabgrass. You need to aim higher – by resolving or reconciling underlying concerns – if you hope to move through conflict and help the parties find new ways of working together.
Search This Page
- Plant The Seed (From A Metaphor A Midwest)
- Till The Ground (From A Midwest Metaphor)
- Choose The Field (From A Midwest Metaphor)
- A Metaphor From The Midwest
- Justice, Peace, and Dialogue
- How Do Patriots Speak?
- Unpacking and Analyzing
- Healing Wounds
- Simple Tools For Sorting and Mapping Public Input
- How Do You Measure Trust?
Posts by Category
Copyright© The Communications Center, Inc. and buildingdialogue.wordpress.com, 2010-2013. Unauthorized use or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to The Communications Center, Inc. and buildingdialogue.wordpress.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.