When planning a public dialogue, you need to analyze the core sources and degree of actual or potential conflict. There are 5 core sources of disputes: these are differences in Values, Information, Interests, or understanding of Relationship, and flaws in Structure (or systems). The more of these elements that are present in any given dispute, the more difficult that dispute is to resolve. If you happen to be in a dispute that is rooted in the rules or processes of a given situation, for example, it will not be solved by providing more data or information. The failure to think about those structures could mean all your efforts to build consensus within that system are doomed to fail. Conversely, if a dispute is rooted in one area, like different interests, yet there are strengths in another area such as strong relationships, you may be able to build a foundation for successful dialogue by focusing first on the common area. Thus in analyzing each of the five areas (Values, Information, Interests, Relationships, and Structure) for planning purposes, you are looking for both strengths and weaknesses. We can help. For more information see http://www.buildingdialogue.com.
Search This Page
- Till The Ground (From A Midwest Metaphor)
- Choose The Field (From A Midwest Metaphor)
- A Metaphor From The Midwest
- Justice, Peace, and Dialogue
- How Do Patriots Speak?
- New E-book
- Healing Wounds
- Simple Tools For Sorting and Mapping Public Input
- How Do You Measure Trust?
- TRUST: 10 Things That Erode Trust – Part 2
Posts by Category
Copyright© The Communications Center, Inc. and buildingdialogue.wordpress.com, 2010-2013. Unauthorized use or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to The Communications Center, Inc. and buildingdialogue.wordpress.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.